Location and pain in contemporary Israeli feature
11.12.07
Notes towards a lecture in Spiegel school regarding a few recent creations from local cinema.
1. Bufor, Yosef Sider (2007)
Timecode: 00:57- 01:0330
When I was offered to deliver this presentation , I have tried to understand what they meant by the word "location". Certainly not the technical cinematic expression.
What is the connection between location and pain?
Then I thought about Jerusalem. Holy Jerusalem.Every stone here is stained with blood. Ancient blood and recent blood.
You could make a film about holiness and beauty, but you’ll have to paint it in red. These walls are tainted in red. like any holy place. Invisible red, blood-colored. The blood of Jews and Arabs who were killed here.
Yosef Sider’s “Bufor”, which won a few international prizes included the Berlin prize. The film takes place in a Lebanese 12th century monastery, where thousands of soldiers fell throughout the years.
I chose to start with a war film, since this is the constant state here. Most films here are done either in a direct context of war or in an escape from it. You can’t talk about Israel without realising we're a nation at war.
Israeli films made a huge progress lately- got very important prizes, much because of the pain, the neverending pain of wars.
Films are done here with intensity, with blood. Many films which are done here
Use blood as the energy source behind the wheels which turn the camera on.
As often happens a lot in film history, deep wounds are turning the wheels of the creation of films here.
Of Course the great big bang of it all of it all was the holocaust. Many films were made here on this subject. Personally i never agreed to do one because:
I never understood it
Because the media has an important role to play in questioning society, Not necessarily the repetition of the image of being the victim .
Most of my life I worked in television in the only station that existed here for over 20 years. We built public consciousness. it was a major responsibility.
A Public channel draws for consensus, but we were looking for truth.
Because the media has a role in history.
I’ll rely on Hegel.
History is full of tragic heroes. My variation of Friedriech Hegel’s definition of the tragic hero: Those who came before their time and history erased, and those who came after their time and history mocked.
"For Friedrich Hegel the tragic heroes of history were those who came too late. Their reasons were noble. They were right in the previous era , but if they continue to insist on them they will be crushed by history.
But those who came too early , striving in vain to speed up the course of history are also history's tragic heroes. They failed to understand that freedom is only the conscious recognition of necessity, which solves only those problems that are capable of solution.
This is a horrible situation. There is no free will , you choose what would have been chosen anyhow .
We are in the middle between both poles.
Many Israelis still believe in old Zionist slogans – like – "a land without people To people without a land" or the dream of "greater Israel" which include the West Bank and Gaza .